What Did I Say When I Said I Have Never Seen A Military Project Ever Successfully Killed?

Build F-136 Into Budget: House

By Colin Clark Friday, July 31st, 2009 4:32 pm
Posted in Air, Policy, Space

Not only did the House Appropriations defense subcommittee call the administration’s bluff on funding for the F-136 engine for the Joint Strike Fighter, it told the Defense Secretary to stuff money into the regular budget in the future.

The House approved $560 million for the second engine on Thursday and, in the report accompanying the defense spending bill, it told Robert Gates to include second engine funding in “future budget requests.” That would mean that the administration could no longer play the shell game of knowing that Congress will include money for the second engine and thus leaving it out of the budget request, which frees up money for other uses.

The report argues that having two different companies build the two engines “is the most cost effective strategy” for the F-35 in the long run and repeats earlier statements that having only engine means any technical problems “could theoretically ground the entire fleet.” The administration issued a wobbly sort-of veto threat in the Statement of Administration Policy about the House defense spending bill. With Pratt and Whitney facing cost increases and insufficient quality controls, the veto threat pretty much speaks for itself.

The House, as looked likely from the day the HAC-D released its markup, backed down on the F-22. Rep. Jack Murtha yielded quietly, offering an amendment that stripped all but $368 million of $1.75 billion slated for the Raptor. The amendment marks $64 million to pay for shutting down the F-22 production line and $139 million is marked for spare engines for Raptors and for C-17s. The remainder of the money goes for advanced targeting pods, radar development and LAIRCM kits for the Air National Guard.

Blogrolled here:





Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *